Comments on: Amy’s New Agenda- http://4wea.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/amys-new-agenda/ Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:23:02 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: PG http://4wea.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/amys-new-agenda/#comment-34 PG Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:46:33 +0000 http://4wea.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-34 Ms. Siskind is showing what she really thinks of other women: http://thenewagenda.net/2009/02/10/a-parable/comment-page-2/#comment-10902 "And we very purposely chose to not list line items as to why we do not endorse Gandy. But suffice it to say that it was unanimous (less one) amongst our Founders group who are prominent women from around the country and perhaps, through our connections, we know more information than you know. Could that be?" Don't you get it? If someone is "prominent" and has "connections," she isn't accountable to the rest of us. She just has to point to her mysterious information and we shut up and nod along. Ms. Siskind is showing what she really thinks of other women:

http://thenewagenda.net/2009/02/10/a-parable/comment-page-2/#comment-10902

“And we very purposely chose to not list line items as to why we do not endorse Gandy. But suffice it to say that it was unanimous (less one) amongst our Founders group who are prominent women from around the country and perhaps, through our connections, we know more information than you know. Could that be?”

Don’t you get it? If someone is “prominent” and has “connections,” she isn’t accountable to the rest of us. She just has to point to her mysterious information and we shut up and nod along.

]]>